Annotation-Pushers
/
cinera_handmade.network
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove the [ref] to Asaf's audio recording 

From hero/code420
This commit is contained in:
Matt Mascarenhas 2018-01-08 18:05:18 +00:00
parent 22b6f570b6
commit 659533765d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
cmuratori/hero/code/code420.hmml
View File

@ -60,9 +60,7 @@
[1:52:46][@derpzerker][Q: Was there a bug with light leaking behind the walls that was newly added?][:lighting :rendering] [1:52:46][@derpzerker][Q: Was there a bug with light leaking behind the walls that was newly added?][:lighting :rendering]
[1:52:56][:Run the game to look for light leaking][:lighting :rendering] [1:52:56][:Run the game to look for light leaking][:lighting :rendering]
[1:54:30][@derpzerker][Q: Maybe not, I thought I saw the light leak through the bottom wall][:lighting :rendering] [1:54:30][@derpzerker][Q: Maybe not, I thought I saw the light leak through the bottom wall][:lighting :rendering]
[1:55:24][@AsafGartner][Q: I'm getting pretty frequent audio popping. Other people noticed it as well. I recorded a sample here[ref [1:55:24][@AsafGartner][Q: I'm getting pretty frequent audio popping. Other people noticed it as well. I recorded a sample]
site=hmhclicking.wav
url=https://f001.backblazeb2.com/file/temp-share/hmhclicking.wav]]
[1:56:03][@qq][Q: When you write code in an exploratory fashion, and you end up with something that works well but is too large and complex to fit in your head at once, how do you simplify it back into something manageable?] [1:56:03][@qq][Q: When you write code in an exploratory fashion, and you end up with something that works well but is too large and complex to fit in your head at once, how do you simplify it back into something manageable?]
[1:57:21][@Jim0_o][Q: Will you continue (dual) streaming to YouTube?] [1:57:21][@Jim0_o][Q: Will you continue (dual) streaming to YouTube?]
[1:58:05][@qq][Q: Are you concerned with compile times at all so far? I saw CTIME reporting 2.7 seconds. Time to pop in a threadripper?] [1:58:05][@qq][Q: Are you concerned with compile times at all so far? I saw CTIME reporting 2.7 seconds. Time to pop in a threadripper?]