Index hero/code581
This commit is contained in:
parent
f27df5b267
commit
fce39d65f0
|
@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
|||
[video member=cmuratori stream_platform=twitch stream_username=handmade_hero project=code title="Preparing for Octahedral Indirect Lighting" vod_platform=youtube id=axbGjkYgXO4 annotator=Miblo]
|
||||
[0:04][Recap our new radial interpolation of :lighting samples and set the stage for the day][:speech]
|
||||
[3:43][This is @Molly Bean][:speech]
|
||||
[4:58][Determine to: 1) Use the ray caster in the octahedral light maps, and 2) Streamline the :lighting voxels intermediate storage out of the equation][:speech]
|
||||
[8:55][Demo the current state of the :lighting, noting our artifacts when a light passes through a probe, and the persistent flower shape due to texel interpolation][:run]
|
||||
[11:14][Toggle off the light probe drawing in EndLightingComputation()][:"debug visualisation" :lighting]
|
||||
[11:31][Traverse the garden without visible light probes][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[12:06][Toggle off EDGE_COLORING in EndLightingComputation() and the light and depth map viewers in OpenGLEndFrame()][:"debug visualisation" :lighting]
|
||||
[12:51][Traverse the clean garden, with the determination to bounce light around][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[13:19][Set up to use the ray caster in the octahedral light maps][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[14:36][Remove the accumulation data from light_voxel_cell, for EndLightingComputation() to update the light directly, enabling TEST_LIGHT_TRANSFER][:"data structure" :lighting]
|
||||
[17:26][See a data-less world][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[17:37][Remove SpamVoxel() and trim down SpamVoxelSlice()][:lighting]
|
||||
[20:36][Consider casting rays from locations other than at light probes][:lighting :speech]
|
||||
[22:23][Rename SpamVoxelSlice() to SpamVoxel() and make it blend in the :lighting directly, augmenting lighting_solution with tUpdateBlend][:"data structure" :lighting]
|
||||
[28:36][Make TestCastFromProbes() pass an octahedral light map location to SpamVoxel(), introducing GetOctahedralOffset()][:lighting]
|
||||
[39:30][See some :lighting][:run]
|
||||
[41:40][Investigate our apparent voxel spamming bug][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[44:05][Make TestCastFromProbes() always call SpamVoxel(), whether or not we hit a light][:lighting]
|
||||
[44:25][See that we mostly write out a tile's :lighting only once we stand on it][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[45:03][Investigate our light writing bug][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[46:31][Scrutinise OctahedralFromUnitVector() and GetOctahedralOffset() for bugs][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[49:45][Break in to GetOctahedralOffset() and inspect its values][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[54:25][Make SpamVoxel() write structured art into the voxel][:"debug visualisation" :lighting]
|
||||
[56:28][See no structured art in the voxels][:"debug visualisation" :lighting :run]
|
||||
[57:05][Scrutinise EndLightingComputation() for bugs][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[58:47][Make SpamVoxel() write red everywhere][:"debug visualisation" :lighting]
|
||||
[59:02][Only see red in voxels we land on][:"debug visualisation" :lighting :run]
|
||||
[59:15][Wonder why we're apparently not spamming the voxels][:"debug visualisation" :lighting :research]
|
||||
[1:00:41][Break in to SpamVoxel() and watch it write to all the voxels][:"debug visualisation" :lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:02:25][Try making TestCastFromProbes() pass an upward-pointing OctOffset vector to SpamVoxel()][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:03:16][See red spammed as expected][:"debug visualisation" :lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:03:43][Revert SpamVoxel() to use the computed :lighting values]
|
||||
[1:04:02][Find that moving the light around does not change the intensity][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:04:40][Make TestCastFromProbes() fall-off the light][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:05:44][See our lighting fall-off work correctly][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:06:28][Revert TestCastFromProbes() to only call SpamVoxel() if we hit a light][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:06:38][Find that we fail to light into newly visible corners][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:06:59][Make TestCastFromProbes() always call SpamVoxel(), but blank out the LightC it we didn't hit a light][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:07:44][Find that our light interpolation is pretty fast][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:08:24][Try reducing the tUpdateBlend in EndLightingComputation()][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:08:38][Find that our light fades out slower than it fades in][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:09:38][Try further reducing the tUpdateBlend in EndLightingComputation()][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:09:46][Watch the speed of light fading][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:11:09][Prevent TestCastFromProbes() from boosting the light brightness][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:11:19][Briefly watch our light fade][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:11:34][Increase the tUpdateBlend in TestCastFromProbes()][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:11:50][Consider our light fade in and out to be more uniform][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:12:08][Reduce the tUpdateBlend in TestCastFromProbes()][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:12:10][Find that our light fades out slower than it fades in][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:13:45][Hunt the code for other pieces of non-linearity in the light fade in / out][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[1:16:54][Make a note in SpamVoxel() to hunt down the attack / decay non-linearity][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:17:37][Our faster attack may happen if two out of three probes switch from 0 to 1][:lighting :speech]
|
||||
[1:18:36][Make GenerateRoom() generate one, rather than two, light probes per tile][:lighting :"procedural generation"]
|
||||
[1:19:17][Find that our light still fades out slower than it fades in][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:20:11][Make GenerateRoom() generate zero light probes per tile][:lighting :"procedural generation"]
|
||||
[1:20:24][See no :lighting][:run]
|
||||
[1:20:27][Make GenerateRoom() generate one light probe per tile][:lighting :"procedural generation"]
|
||||
[1:20:44][Find that our light still fades out slower than it fades in][:lighting :run]
|
||||
[1:21:02][Revert GenerateRoom() to generate two light probes per tile][:lighting :"procedural generation"]
|
||||
[1:21:06][Consider how to investigate our fading speed discrepancy][:lighting :speech]
|
||||
[1:21:48][Begin to plot our :lighting update equation in Desmos[ref
|
||||
site=Desmos
|
||||
page="Untitled Graph"
|
||||
url=https://desmos.com/calculator]][:mathematics :research]
|
||||
[1:24:29][Set the day][:admin]
|
||||
[1:25:26][:Lighting Linear Blend Per Frame: In vs Out][:blackboard :mathematics]
|
||||
[1:33:46][Further study: Perceptual rate of fading in vs out][:blackboard :lighting :mathematics]
|
||||
[1:35:25][Remove Frumbledygok(), and toggle from TestCastFromProbes() to ComputeLightPropagation() in EndLightingComputation()][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:37:26][Make ComputeLightPropagationWork() call SpamVoxel() and cast our real rays into the octahedral light map][:lighting]
|
||||
[1:42:34][Begin to update ComputeVoxelIrradianceAt() to sample the octahedral light map][:lighting :sampling]
|
||||
[1:45:47][Diffuse :Sampling][:blackboard :lighting]
|
||||
[1:49:47][Consult 'Dynamic Diffuse Global Illumination with Ray-Traced Irradiance Fields'[ref
|
||||
title="Dynamic Diffuse Global Illumination with Ray-Traced Irradiance Fields"
|
||||
author="Jean-Philippe Guertin, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Morgan McGuire"
|
||||
url=http://jcgt.org/published/0008/02/01/] on diffuse :sampling][:research]
|
||||
[1:52:22][Consult 'Real-Time Global Illumination using Precomputed Light Field Probes'[ref
|
||||
author="Morgan McGuire, Michael Mara, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, David Luebke"
|
||||
title="Real-Time Global Illumination using Precomputed Light Field Probes"
|
||||
url=https://casual-effects.com/research/McGuire2017LightField/] on diffuse :sampling][:lighting :research]
|
||||
[2:03:13][Spec out specular :sampling in ComputeVoxelIrradianceAt()][:lighting]
|
||||
[2:05:24][Glimpse the (broken) specular :lighting][:run :sampling]
|
||||
[2:05:32][Defer figuring out diffuse :sampling of the octahedral map][:lighting :speech]
|
||||
[2:06:24][Q&A][:speech]
|
||||
[2:07:50][@xxthebigfoxx][Q: Is the diffuse component going to be computed on the CPU or the GPU then?][:lighting :sampling]
|
||||
[2:08:33][@relvet][Q: Since :hardware standards move quickly, have you considered doing a pass on the codebase to move to newer versions of OpenGL and SSE? The optimization implications alone should be worth it, or?]
|
||||
[2:09:56][@cerdus][What is the current OpenGL version?]
|
||||
[2:10:38][@philliptrudeau][Q: Did the paper[ref
|
||||
title="Dynamic Diffuse Global Illumination with Ray-Traced Irradiance Fields"
|
||||
author="Jean-Philippe Guertin, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Morgan McGuire"
|
||||
url=http://jcgt.org/published/0008/02/01/] say that they compute a separate cosine-weighted radiance for every probe? Where do they store that information?]
|
||||
[2:12:10][@erdomina][Q: Any pointers on reading research papers effectively?]
|
||||
[2:12:35][@philliptrudeau][Is this a "research paper"?]
|
||||
[2:13:25][@philliptrudeau][Journal of Fluffy Opinion Papers]
|
||||
[2:13:58][Wrap it up][:speech]
|
||||
[/video]
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue